D - ESP
Coronavirus19 5i: since April 7, 2021
Warnings from Mike Yeadon, former Pfizer vice president
Variants are different at a maxium of 0.3% and are NOT more dangerous (simulation of dead bodies with actors and garbage bags!) - the death rate with mRNA gene vaccinations is 0.8% in 2 weeks - the rest of vaccinated persons dies in 2 to 3 years - antibodies are not important, but T cells are important - mutations are harmless, President Johnson is a criminal liar - children to vaccinate is total nonsense, because children hardly die from Corona19, but often from genetic vaccination! - Vaccination certificate is hell, live normally!
Dr. Mike Yeadon, Ex-Chefberater von Pfizer, Porträt 
präsentiert von Michael Palomino (2021)
|Teilen / share:
Resistance "USA", April 7, 2021: Appeal from Dr. Yeadon: NEVER vaccinate! Death rate in 2 weeks 0.8% - the others will live an average of 2 years - with each "refreshment" more and more die - maximum survival time: 3 years
Mike Yeadon, former Pfizer chief scientist, has stated that it is now too late to save everyone who has been vaccinated with a Covid-19 vaccine. He calls on those who have not yet been vaccinated with the deadly drug to fight for the survival of people and the lives of their children. The globally recognized immunologist continues to describe the process that he believes will kill the vast majority of people living now. Immediately after receiving the first injection, approximately 0.8% of people die within 2 weeks. The survivors have an average life expectancy of 2 years, which however is reduced with each booster vaccination.
Additional vaccines will be developped that will destroy certain organs - including the heart, lungs and brain. Professor Yeadon, who has been familiar with the workings and goals of research and development at pharmaceutical giant Pfizer for two decades, notes that the ultimate goal of the current vaccination regime can only be mass depopulation, and the dimension is giant mass murder so all world wars together seem to be a Mickey Mouse production.
"Billions are already doomed to certain, irreversible, and agonizing deaths. Anyone who receives the vaccination is certain to die prematurely, and 3 years is a generous estimate of how long they are likely to be alive."
[Supplement: Some people receive a fake vaccine with saline solution as member of secret comparison group of the experiment].
7 April 2021: Yeadon warns from pharma lies about "immunity", from genetic vaccines and top-ups, from vaccines without safety studies, from discrimination with Covid passports and banking "reset":
EXCLUSIVE - Former Pfizer VP: ‘Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.’
‘Look out the window, and think, “why is my government lying to me about something so fundamental?” Because, I think the answer is, they are going to kill you using this method. They’re going to kill you and your family.’
By Patrick Delaney
April 7, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory who spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and retired from the pharmaceutical giant with “the most senior research position” in his field, spoke with LifeSiteNews in a telephone interview.
He addressed the “demonstrably false” propaganda from governments in response to COVID-19, including the “lie” of dangerous variants, the totalitarian potential for “vaccine passports,” and the strong possibility we are dealing with a “conspiracy” which could lead to something far beyond the carnage experienced in the wars and massacres of the 20th century.
His main points included:
There is “no possibility” current variants of COVID-19 will escape immunity. It is “just a lie.”
Yet, governments around the world are repeating this lie, indicating that we are witnessing not just “convergent opportunism,” but a “conspiracy.” Meanwhile media outlets and Big Tech platforms are committed to the same propaganda and the censorship of the truth.
Pharmaceutical companies have already begun to develop unneeded “top-up” (“booster”) vaccines for the “variants.” The companies are planning to manufacture billions of vials, in addition to the current experimental COVID-19 “vaccine” campaign.
Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, have announced that since these “top-up” vaccines will be so similar to the prior injections which were approved for emergency use authorization, drug companies will not be required to “perform any clinical safety studies.”
Thus, this virtually means that design and implementation of repeated and coerced mRNA vaccines “go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, [injecting] some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.”
[They installed a perpetuum mobile: they invent provisional approbations - they invent mutations and variants - they invent additional vaccines without any approbation - and in this way they earn billions from the tax payers - and the corrupt governments don't see the trap but they aggree reducing the population...]
Why are they doing this? Since no benign reason is apparent, the use of vaccine passports along with a “banking reset” could issue in a totalitarianism unlike the world has ever seen. Recalling the evil of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, “mass depopulation” remains a logical outcome.
The fact that this at least could be true means everyone must “fight like crazy to make sure that system never forms.”
Dr. Yeadon began identifying himself as merely a “boring guy” who went “to work for a big drug company … listening to the main national broadcast and reading the broad sheet newspapers.”
Continuing, he said: “But in the last year I have realized that my government and its advisers are lying in the faces of the British people about everything to do with this coronavirus. Absolutely everything. It’s a fallacy this idea of asymptomatic transmission and that you don’t have symptoms, but you are a source of a virus. That lockdowns work, that masks have a protective value obviously for you or someone else, and that variants are scary things and we even need to close international borders in case some of these nasty foreign variants get in.
“Or, by the way, on top of the current list of gene-based vaccines that we have miraculously made, there will be some ‘top-up’ vaccines to cope with the immune escape variants.
“Everything I have told you, every single one of those things is demonstrably false. But our entire national policy is based on these all being broadly right, but they are all wrong.”
‘Conspiracy’ and not just ‘convergent opportunism’
“But what I would like to do is talk about immune escape because I think that’s probably going to be the end game for this whole event, which I think is probably a conspiracy. Last year I thought it was what I called ‘convergent opportunism,’ that is a bunch of different stakeholder groups have managed to pounce on a world in chaos to push us in a particular direction. So it looked like it was kind of linked, but I was prepared to say it was just convergence.”
“I [now] think that’s naïve. There is no question in my mind that very significant powerbrokers around the world have either planned to take advantage of the next pandemic or created the pandemic. One of those two things is true because the reason it must be true is that dozens and dozens of governments are all saying the same lies and doing the same inefficacious things that demonstrably cost lives.
“And they are talking the same sort of future script which is, ‘We don’t want you to move around because of these pesky varmints, these “variants”’— which I call ‘samiants’ by the way, because they are pretty much the same — but they’re all saying this and they are all saying ‘don’t worry, there will be “top-up” vaccines that will cope with the potential escapees.’ They’re all saying this when it is obviously nonsense.”
Possible end game: vaccine ‘passports’ tied to spending allowances, thorough control
“I think the end game is going to be, ‘everyone receives a vaccine’… Everyone on the planet is going to find themselves persuaded, cajoled, not quite mandated, hemmed-in to take a jab.
“When they do that every single individual on the planet will have a name, or unique digital ID and a health status flag which will be ‘vaccinated,’ or not … and whoever possesses that, sort of single database, operable centrally, applicable everywhere to control, to provide as it were, a privilege, you can either cross this particular threshold or conduct this particular transaction or not depending on [what] the controllers of that one human population database decide. And I think that’s what this is all about because once you’ve got that, we become playthings and the world can be as the controllers of that database want it.
“For example, you might find that after a banking reset that you can only spend through using an app that actually feeds off this [database], your ID, your name, [and] your health status flag.”
“And, yes, certainly crossing an international border is the most obvious use for these vaccine passports, as they are called, but I’ve heard talk of them already that they could be necessary for you to get into public spaces, enclosed public spaces. I expect that if they wanted to, you would not be able to leave your house in the future without the appropriate privilege on your app.
“But even if that’s not [the] true [intent of the vaccine campaign], it doesn’t matter, the fact that it could be true means everyone [reading] this should fight like crazy to make sure that [vaccine passport] system never forms.”
“[With such a system], here is an example of what they could make you do, and I think this is what they’re going to make [people] do.
“You could invent a story that is about a virus and its variations, its mutations over time. You could invent the story and make sure you embed it through the captive media, make sure that no one can counter it by censoring alternative sources, then people are now familiar with this idea that this virus mutates, which it does, and that it produces variants, which is true [as well], which could escape your immune system, and that’s a lie.
“But, nevertheless, we’re going to tell you it’s true, and then when we tell you that it’s true and we say ‘but we’ve got the cure, here’s a top-up vaccine,’ you’ll get a message, based on this one global, this one ID system: ‘Bing!’ it will come up and say ‘Dr. Yeadon, time for your top-up vaccine. And, by the way,’ it will say ‘your existing immune privileges remain valid for four weeks. But if you don’t get your top-up vaccine in that time, you will unfortunately detrimentally be an “out person,” and you don’t want that, do you?’ So, that’s how it’ll work, and people will just walk up and they’ll get their top-up vaccine.”
Gov’t lies, Big Pharma moves forward, medicine regulators get out of the way, and possible ‘mass-depopulation’
“But I will take you through this, Patrick, because I am qualified to comment. I don’t know what Vanden Bossche is about. There was no possibility at all, based on all of the variants that are in the public domain, 4000 or so of them, none of them are going to escape immunity [i.e. become more dangerous].
“Nevertheless, politicians and health advisers (to loads of governments) are saying that they are. They’re lying. Well, why would you do that?
“Here’s the other thing, in parallel, pharmaceutical companies have said, several of them, it will be quite easy for us to adjust our gene-based vaccines, and we can hasten them through development, and we can help you.
“And here’s the real scary part, global medicines regulators like [the U.S. Food and Drug Administration] FDA, the Japanese medicines agency, the European Medicines Agency, have gotten together and announced … since top-up vaccines will be considered so similar to the ones that we have already approved for emergency use authorization, we are not going to require the drug companies to perform any clinical safety studies.
“So, you’ve got on the one hand, governments and their advisers that are lying to you that variants are different enough from the current virus that, even if you’re immune from natural exposure or vaccination, you’re a risk and you need to come and get this top-up vaccine. So, I think neither of those are true. So why is the drug company making the top-up vaccines? And [with] the regulators having got out of the way — and if Yeadon is right, and I’m sure I am or I wouldn’t be telling you this — you go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.
“And if you wanted to introduce a characteristic which could be harmful and could even be lethal, and you can even tune it to say ‘let’s put it in some gene that will cause liver injury over a nine-month period,’ or, cause your kidneys to fail but not until you encounter this kind of organism [that would be quite possible]. Biotechnology provides you with limitless ways, frankly, to injure or kill billions of people.
“And since I can’t think of a benign explanation for any of the steps: variants, top-up vaccines, no regulatory studies… it’s not only that I cannot think of a benign explanation, the steps described, and the scenario described, and the necessary sort of resolution to this false problem is going to allow what I just described: unknown, and unnecessary gene sequences injected into the arms of potentially billions of people for no reason.
“I’m very worried … that pathway will be used for mass depopulation, because I can’t think of any benign explanation.”
‘Absurdly impossible’ variants will escape immunity, ‘just a lie’
“If I can show you that one major thing that governments around the world are telling the people is a lie, you should take my 32 years of experienced opinion that says, most of it, if not all of it, is a lie.”
“The most different variant is only 0.3% different from the original sequence as emailed out of Wuhan in … January 2020. 0.3% [is] the one [variant] that is the most different on the planet so far. And now another way of saying it is, ‘all of the variants are not less than 99.7% identical to each other.’
“Now, you might be thinking, ‘hmm, 0.3%, is that enough [to escape immunity and become more dangerous]?’ The answer is no. Get away, ya know, get out of here …
“The human immune system is a thing of wonder. What it does is when it faces a new pathogen like this, you’ve got professional cells, they’re called professional antigen-presenting cells —they’re kind of rough tough things that tend not to succumb to viruses. And their job is to grab foreign things in the near environment and tear them limb from limb [inside the cell]. They really cut them up into hundreds of pieces. And then they present these pieces on the surfaces of their cell to other bits of your immune system, and amazingly, because of the variability that God and nature gave you, huge variability to recognize foreign things, and your body ends up using 15 to 20 different specific motifs that it spots about this virus. They’re called epitopes, basically they’re just like little photographs of the details about this virus. That’s what they do. And that is what is called your repertoire, your immune repertoire is like 20 different accurate photographs, close-ups, of different bits of this virus.
“Now, if a tiny piece of the virus changes, like the 0.3% I’ve just described, if you are reinfected by that variant, your professional cells tear into that virus and cut it into pieces, present them again, and lo and behold, most of the pieces that you have already seen and recognized, are still there in the variants.
“There is absolutely no chance that all of them will fail to be recognized and that is what is required for immune escape, to escape your immunity. It must present to you as a new pathogen. It must be sufficiently different that, when it is cut up by your professional checker cells, it won’t find mostly the same thing it has seen before. And that is just absurdly impossible when you have only varied 0.3%, so it is 99.7% (similar).
“And before them, coming from my theoretical understanding of multi-locus immunity, which is what I just badly tried to describe, to what actually happens … If your [immune system] is presented with something that contains even half of those similar pieces, there is no way your body will say, ‘that’s a new pathogen.’
“And, so, the idea that 0.3% could even have a chance of getting around immunity is just a lie. It’s not [even] like an opinion difference.
“I don’t think 3% would be enough. That’s 10 times more variation than has occurred in 16 months [with this virus]. I don’t even think 30% difference would be enough. So, I’m saying that 100 times more variation than has actually happened, would still leave me putting a big bet on the human immune system not being fooled that these are new pathogens.
“I’ve chatted this over with several professors of immunology and they agreed with me, it’s like, ‘why are you asking me this?’
“So, I think that what I’ve just said is that governments and their advisors in multiple countries are lying about variants. That’s a massive thing! You should check it out. Your readers should check it out. If it’s true, don’t you think it’s terrifying?! It was when I realized it.
“So, they’re lying about variants, and then, of course, since [the variants] are not really different, you do not need a ‘top-up’ vaccine. Now you should be getting the hairs on the back of your neck up, because they are making them right now!”
“They are making billions of vials of it. And they will be available by the end of the year.
“And I think they’ll require people to first, be on the vaccine passport one-world database, and then it will roll up into the top-ups, and if it takes a bit longer it will take a bit longer.
“But this is not going away. It won’t go away until enough people, if they ever do, say ‘you’re a bunch of frauds and we are taking our freedoms back, so you can just stop doing this.’
“Because one person shouting into the wilderness and all of the other academics looking the other way, will have us just going down this pipe maybe a week later than if I hadn’t said anything, but we’re still going down to hell.
“So, that’s why I’m frightened.
“The variants aren’t different. I call them ‘samiants’… they’re pretty much the same. They’re not different. Therefore, you don’t need a top-up vaccine, so don’t go near any of them.”
‘Why is my government lying to me?’ Because ‘they are going to kill you.’
“[And if you recognize that our governments are involved in a major verifiable lie], don’t just turn your computer off and go to supper. Stop. Look out the window, and think, ‘why is my government lying to me about something so fundamental?’ Because, I think the answer is, they are going to kill you using this method. They’re going to kill you and your family.
“The eugenicists [crazy criminal people of the Committe of 300 in London] have got hold of the levers of power and this is a really artful way of getting you to line-up and receive some unspecified thing that will damage you. I have no idea what it will actually be, but it won’t be a vaccine because you don’t need one.
[The genetic vaccinations against corona19 are in reality GENETIC FIGHTING AGENTS].
And it won’t kill you on the end of the needle because you would spot that.
[The genetic fighting agent is killing the victims mostly from 6 months afterwards].
“It could be something that will produce normal pathology, it will be at various times between vaccination and the event, it will be plausibly deniable because there will be something else going on in the world at that time, in the context of which your demise, or that of your children will look normal.
“That’s what I would do if I wanted to get rid of 90 or 95% of the world’s population. And I think that’s what they’re doing.”
“Now I don’t know [for certain] that they’re going to use that [system] to kill you, but I can’t think of a benign reason, and with that power they certainly could harm you, or control you, so you should object [and strenuously oppose it].”
People can’t deal with this level of evil, but Soviets, Hitler, Mao show its possibility
“It’s become absolutely clear to me, even when I talk to intelligent people, friends, acquaintances … and they can tell I’m telling them something important, but they get to the point [where I say] ‘your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death and that of your children,’ and they can’t begin to engage with it. And I think maybe 10% of them understand what I said, and 90% of those blank their understanding of it because it is too difficult. And my concern is, we are going to lose this, because people will not deal with the possibility that anyone is so evil…
“But I remind you of what happened in Russia in the 20th Century, what happened in 1933 to 1945, what happened in, you know, Southeast Asia in some of the most awful times in the post-war era. And, what happened in China with Mao and so on.
“We’ve only got to look back two or three generations. All around us there are people who are as bad as the people doing this. They’re all around us. So, I say to folks, the only thing that really marks this one out, is its scale.
“But actually, this is probably less bloody, it’s less personal, isn’t it? The people who are steering this … it’s going to be much easier for them. They don’t have to shoot anyone in the face. They don’t have to beat someone to death with a baseball bat, or freeze them, starve them, make them work until they die. All of those things did happen two or three generations back and our grandparents or great grandparents were either victims of this, or they were actually members of it, or at least they witnessed it from overseas. That’s how close we are.
“And all I’m saying is, some shifts like that are happening again, but now they are using molecular biology.
“And the people going along with it, I think they would probably say, ‘I was only following orders,’ which we have heard before.
“But I know, because I have talked to lots of people, and some of them have said ‘I don’t want to believe that you are right, so I’m going to just put it away because if it is true, I can’t handle it.’ And I think … all you need to do is find a good reason to tell people, ‘Don’t take the vaccine unless you’re a medical risk of dying from the virus!’ That seems to me a pretty good line!”
Towards a solution – ‘We need God’
“I’m a scientist, and I can tell you, talking to non-scientists, using science as a tool, will not work. It will fail.
“So, we need philosophers, people who understand logic, religion, something like that, [they have] got to wrestle with this, and start talking in a language people will understand. Because if we leave it with scientists, people like me, even though I’m well-intentioned, I’m a gabbling alien as far as most people in the street are concerned. They won’t believe the government will lie to them, they don’t believe the government would ever do anything that will harm them, but they are [doing such things].”
Finally, in an email correspondence, Dr. Yeadon concluded, “I have latest taken to signing off with ‘May God save us’, because I think we need God now more than at any time since WW2.”
LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.
May 21, 2021: Ex-Pfizer-Vice Dr. Mike Yeadon appeals to get your life back: mask + lockdowns + gene vaccinations are superfluous + scientists have almost all become corrupt - with the vaccination passport comes the change of the system:
Ex-Pfizer employee warns, “Something really bad is going on
(original Deutsch: Ex-Pfizer-Mitarbeiter warnt: „Etwas wirklich Schlimmes ist im Gange)
<Politicians are not telling the truth, warns Mike Yeadon, a former vice president of vaccine company Pfizer. “That they are not telling the truth implies that something else is going on. Something very bad is going on. "
“If you are not careful, you will soon have no chance of doing anything about it. And don't say you weren't warned. I've been warning people for as long as I can. You can still get your life back now,” said Dr. Yeadon, who also served as Pfizer's chief scientific advisor.
“You don't need a face mask. They don't work. Forget about lockdowns. They do not help slow down transmission, which has largely occurred in hospitals and nursing homes. You don't need to be vaccinated with under-tested and somewhat dangerous gene-based spike-producing proteins. And you don't have to listen to the corrupt scientists who seem to advise our government”, he said.
If everyone follows this advice, it will all be over in a couple of weeks. But when the vaccination certificate comes, in my opinion there is no going back and you will regret it, emphasized the ex-Pfizer employee.
The pictures below were shared on Twitter by journalist Patrick Henningsen, founder of the news site 21st Century Wire, on Saturday:
Listen and SHARE. The time to push back hard on this nefarious and corrupt agenda is right now: pic.twitter.com/ljHbt74Ndh— Patrick Henningsen (@21WIRE) May 15, 2021>
June 11, 2021: Ex-Pfizer-Vice Dr. Mike Yeadon warns: 1) Gene vaccinations are nonsense with fatal blood clots from the spike protein, AND 2) Children hardly have Corona19, death from vaccination in children is 50 TIMES HIGHER than death from the coronavirus:
Former Pfizer VP Mike Yeadon warns: children are 50 times more likely to die from the vaccine than from the virus
(original Deutsch: Der ehemalige VP von Pfizer, Mike Yeadon warnt, dass die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass Kinder am Impfstoff sterben, 50 Mal höher ist als am Virus)
<In the United States, children of 12 to 15 years will be vaccinated against corona this fall. Fauci wants the school children to be vaccinated before the end of the year. According to Steve Bannon, this will lead to a lot of resistance, especially among mothers. In his podcast Bannon’s War Room, he warns of a storm of indignation.
His guest Mike Yeadon, the former vice president of Pfizer, said the corona vaccines are not safe. He explained that these vaccines cause your body to produce spike proteins. "And we've known for years that virus spike proteins cause blood clots," he said. In December he wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to point this out.
75 percent of the side effects
Yeadon went on to say that about 75 percent of the side effects that occur after vaccination are related to blood clots and bleeding. “Young people don't get sick of Covid. When they get the virus, they usually have no symptoms. You are not at risk,” he emphasized.
He also said that vaccinating children is "mad" because he believes the vaccine is 50 times more likely to kill them than the virus itself.>
Text (englisch): https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/06/children-50-times-more-likely-to-die-from-vaccine-than-covid-ex-pfizer-vice-president/
Speaker Steve Bannon: Since August 2021 a fire storm will come up in the "USA"
Steve Bannon: Okay. I wanna return now to Dr. Mike Yeadon. Formerly of Pfizer. Dr. Yeadon, there’s gonna be a fire, I don’t know about the rest of the world (7'') but I can guarantee you there is going to be a firestorm starting in August (12''). In this Nation, the "United States of America" (14''). When the mothers in this country that have already been up on this whole mask situation and Critical Race Theory at the school board level (23''). When they go back and according to Dr. Fauci, this is not Steven K. Bannon, this is Fauci’s interviews with Savannah Guthrie at the Morning Show at NBC, the Today Show (34''). Also what he told the AP. That they’re gonna start [genetical] vaccinating the 12-15 year olds (38''), the kids in middle school and high school as soon as they get back in the fall (41''), AND that the school children will be [genetically] vaccinated by the end of the year (44''). [That are] His [Fauci's] words, not Bannon’s (46''). I want you to walk through: There’s gonna be a firestorm because this is not the anti vaxx crowd (51''). I’m talking about the vaccine hesitant mothers (54''), right, joined with the anti vaxxers and that’s to me is two thirds of the country, two thirds of the mothers (1'0''). Walk us through your thoughts about this [genetical] vaccine, particularly for adolescence and for school aged children and younger (1'7'').
Dr. Michael Yeadon: Spike proteins trigger blood clots and bleedings by blood clots
Dr. Michael Yeadon: Certainly. So just to reiterate, I’m off the industry, [one time, there was] my whole career. And I’m generally pro vaccine but I’m pro safety and these COVID-19 vaccines are NOT SAFE (1'20''). Very briefly, they’re not safe because the gene based design makes your body manufacture virus spike protein (1'29''). And we know, and we’ve known for years, the virus spike proteins trigger blood clots (1'35''). So there’s plenty of literature. No one can fault the statement I just made (1'39'').
Dr. Wodarg and I wrote to the European Medicines Agency, in December [2020 - link], pointing that out (1'44''). So that’s a fundamental problem. About 75% of the adverse events that occur after [mRNA] vaccination [affecting the DNA], which are very much higher than usual (1'55''), relate to thromboembolic events. That is blood clots and bleedings (1'59''). What I just said about the design and the property of spike protein exactly matches the serious adverse events that are emerging (2'7'').
Dr. Michael Yeadon: Children and youth are hardly affected by Corona virus - vaccination will be 50 times MORE deadly for them than the virus
Now here’s the real problem I’ve got, Steve. And I’m a father and a grandfather. Young people are NOT susceptible to COVID-19 (2'16''). If they acquire the virus, they usually have no symptoms (2'19'') and they shrug it off very easily (2'21''). So they’re not at risk (2'22''). It’s a crazy thing and to vaccinate them with something that is actually 50 times more likely to kill them than the virus itself (2'30'').
The warning was repeatedly published by Uncutnews on June 18, 2021:The vaccination is 50 times more dangerous than coronavirus for children and adolescents, says Michael Yeadon, ex-CEO of Pfizer. One of the honest men in the pharmaceutical industry. At least now, he's no longer active ...
WARNING 6/18/2021: Ex-Pfizer Vice Yeadon: 1) Spike proteins provoke blood clots - AND 2) Children are 50 times more likely to die from criminal gene vaccination than from Corona19 itself:
Former Pfizer VP Mike Yeadon Warns: Programmed Spike Proteins Create Blood Clots - Video
(original German: Der ehemalige VP von Pfizer, Mike Yeadon warnt: Programmierte Spike Proteine erzeugen Blutgerinnsel – Video)
"USA" 6/12/2021: Ex-Pfizer Vice Yeadon: Children hardly die from Corona19 - but will die from the Pfizer gene injection:
Former Pfizer Vice President Dr. Michael Yeadon, on the corona vaccination for young people:
"It's a crazy thing to then vaccinate them [the children] with something that is 50 times more likely to kill them than the virus itself."
(German: "Es ist eine verrückte Sache, sie [die Kinder] dann mit etwas zu impfen, das sie mit 50 Mal größerer Wahrscheinlichkeit töten wird, als das Virus selbst.")
WARNING 6/18/2021: Ex-Pfizer Vice-Vice President Yeadon: When the vaccination certificate arrives, hell is here - endless lies of the governments - Lie 1: antibodies are NOT important, but T cells are! - Lie 2: mutations are NOT dangerous - President Johnson GO TO PRISON FOR YOUR LIES!
“We stand at the gates of hell.” Ex-Vice President of Pfizer unpacks | Planet Lockdown (DE)
(original German: „Wir stehen an den Pforten der Hölle.“ Ex-Vizepräsident von Pfizer packt aus | Planet Lockdown (DE)
Former chief scientist and vice president of US pharmaceutical company Pfizer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, raises serious allegations against the corona policy practiced globally. Dr. Yeadon is an expert in allergy and respiratory therapy and has many years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry.
Video: We stand at the gates of hell Ex Vice President of Pf (57'52'')
(German: Wir stehen an den Pforten der Hölle Ex Vizepräsident von Pf)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofb9am3O-Tk - YouTube-Kanal:
Video: We stand at the gates of hell Ex Vice President of Pf (57'52'')
(German: Wir stehen an den Pforten der Hölle Ex Vizepräsident von Pf)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofb9am3O-Tk - YouTube-Kanal:
June 18, 2021: Dr. Mike Yeadon (Ex-Vice Pfizer) warns of hell through the vaccination certificate
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dpOApeJKtPZn/ - Bitchute channel: NatMed-etc. - installed on June 20, 2021
Transcription of the translation in the video:
Film Title: Planet Lockdown (5``). Lockdown (13''). Michael Yeadon (15``). Full interview (18'').
Dr. Mike Yeadon:
Hello my name is dr Mike Yeadon (25``). I am a qualified life sciences researcher (29''). I have a degree in Biochemistry and Toxicology (32'') and I have a research-based PhD in Respiratory Pharmacology (37''). And then I worked mainly in large pharmaceutical companies for 32 years and in the biotechnology sector for 10 years (44''). In my last job in the pharmaceutical industry, I was Vice President and Chief Scientist of Allergy and Respiratory Research (53''). I left Pfizer in 2011 (56''). Then I founded a biotech company called Ziarco, built it up and sold it to Novartis (1'2''). That was in 2017 (1'5''). And before and after that, I was an independent consultant for over 30 start-up biotech companies (1'10''). So you can assume that I am in favor of new drugs of all kinds (1'15'').
Our goal has always been to meet the unmet medical need, and to do so with an acceptable level of security in the medical context (1'32''). I advocate all kinds of new medical treatments (1'35''), whether they are biologics, vaccines, small molecules, creams, sprays, ointments or whatever (1'43'').
Dr. Mike Yeadon: Gene vaccinations are unsafe + used inappropriately
But I am strongly against unsafe drugs, or against drugs that are used in an inappropriate context (1'50''). What I will say does not speak in favor of the current release of gene-based vaccines (1'56''). They are used inappropriately (1'58''). I don't think they have a sufficient safety profile to be used as a broad-spectrum profile active ingredient for public health (2'7'').
Due to my pharmaceutical and biotechnological background, I am a proponent of new, medical active ingredients (2'14'') that meet an unmet need when they are SAFE (2'18'') - regardless the matter is about a vaccine or about a biological agent like an antibody (2'23''). Or whether it is a so-called low-molecular therapeutic agent (2'27''), that means: a pill or a tablet (2'30'').
Unsafe drugs are unacceptable
But I am against unsafe drugs of any kind (2'34''). So my criticism is sometimes low molecular weight substances [pills, tablets], and sometimes "safe" vaccines (2'40''). So I am generally FOR new drugs (2'43'') as long as they are safe, effective, and used appropriately (2'47''). And I am against the opposite of these things (2'50'').
Unsafe drugs are unacceptable
But I am against unsafe drugs of any kind (2'34''). So my criticism is sometimes low molecular weight substances [pills, tablets], and sometimes "safe" vaccines (2'40''). So I am generally FOR new drugs (2'43'') as long as they are safe, effective, and used appropriately (2'47''). And I am against the opposite of these things (2'50'').
Dr. Yeadon with the ability to identify unsafe drugs
A few things enable me to see what is going on in the world at the moment [approx. June 15, 2021] (2'56''). I have two big advantages (2'58'').
1. I've loved biology since I was little (3'1''). This year it's 40 years that I have been studying and learning how to apply biology (3'6''), be it pharmacology, biochemistry, molecular biology or toxicology (3'11'').
The combinatorial skills of Dr. Mike Yeadon
So I am very familiar with all things that have to do with life sciences in relation to health and disease (3'18''). But one of my previous bosses said that I had a remarkable ability that was different from what a vice president or chairman of the board normally does (3'29''). He said that I was able to recognize patterns with just a few data (3'34''). When most colleagues found the data insufficient [to] assess what was going on (3'40 "), I was often able to identify it (3'42"). I was able to derive a pattern, even if there was little information available (3'47'').
I think there were a lot of simulations going on in my head (3'50''), so instead of waiting for more data (3'57'') I tried to figure out what those little bits of information might mean. My standard sentence was:
"I think I know what is happening here." (4'1'')
Sometimes I applied this during an election process of products in the industry, or when we were pursuing a program, or with regard to what the competition was doing (4'10'').
Dr. Yeadon recognizes the lies of the pharmaceutical industry with the Corona19 virus (Covid-19)
In the current situation I could see very quickly that what we were told about this virus, and about the necessary protective measures (4'19''), simply did not correspond to the truth [not true] (4'22'') .
Example maneuver in UK: Changing the types of death to fake a pandemic - total LIE in death documents
For example, enormous changes have already been made in the assignment of causes of death in Great Britain (4'30''). There has NEVER been something as absurd as the rule that is now applied (4'34''). If you die within 28 days of a positive test result - this means: tested with an inappropriate test from molecular biology (4'44''), then you will be "declared" a Covid 19 dead (4'47''). That is simply a FAKE (4'48'').
Example maneuvers: The lockdowns are totally inappropriate and "nonsense"+"bullshit" - the sick and infectious are already in bed
It's not just about a technical difference of opinion (4'51''). But it is complete nonsense (4'53''). Besides the unreliability and untrustworthiness of PCR testing, we can also talk about things like lockdowns (5'0''). This term alone (5'3''): There has NEVER been a situation where we had to limit the contact to one another to a minimum and that this should "save" us (5'9''). I knew from the start that it was nonsense (5'12''). And the reason is simple: only people who are sick and have symptoms are a real risk of infection for other people (5'20''). And these people don't walk in the city (5'22''). Because if you actually have viruses and symptoms, you are sick and stay at home or in bed (5'28''). Or if it's very serious, you end up in the hospital or die (5'32'').
But the idea arose to prevent normal contacts at work and in social life (5'39'') in order to slow down the spread of the epidemic (5'41''). I was pretty sure from the start that THAT was bullshit (5'46'').
Unfortunately it took several months until that was clear (6'0''). By then, the idea that a curfew was necessary had already become quite entrenched in most parts of the world (6'6''). Basically everything what the government tells you about the virus and the necessary protective measures is a lie, JUST EVERYTHING (6'15'').
[Because a government has NO medical education and does not know ANYTHING about medicine, but they are simulating to know something in Mickey Mouse style - comics style like the faked moon landing!]NO evidence of asymptomatic virus transmission or for an effect of gene vaccination
And NOT A SINGLE of the key topics you hear about all the time
-- from the asymptomatic transmission (6'20'')
-- up to the [gene] vaccination (6'22'')
is scientifically proven (6'23'').
It is worked with cleverly chosen allusions and half-truths (6'27''). But in the end there is always a lie (6'30''). That has led us to where I think we are now (6'34'').
Dr. Yeadon: We are "at the gates of hell" if the lies continue and the vaccination certificate comes
I don't usually use such phrases (6'37''), but I believe that we are standing at the gates of hell (standing (6'40'').
Word by word: I don't normally use phrases like this but I think we are standing on the very gates of hell (6'46'').
Example maneuvers: Lockdown against crowds
For example, when I first heard the term "lockdown" I thought - like most people - that the term refers to the control of unruly prisoners (7'0''). It is a control measure (7'2''). And I think: pretty much everything that has happened since then has to do with control (7'6'').
Example maneuvers: The lie of the asymptomatic infections
This myth of asymptomatic transmission that is just not true as I mentioned earlier (7'12''). In order to transmit a virus in order to be an efficient source of infection, you have to have a lot of viruses (7'19''). And if you have a lot of viruses in you, they attack you and your body defends itself against it (7'24''). This process inevitably leads to symptoms - that is always the case (7'29''). And so all people are sick who are efficient sources of infection (7'32'').
So if there are asymptomatic transfers at all, then this is a maximum of 0.1 to 1% (7'40'').
Example maneuvers: The lies of the governments + corrupt "scientists" to control a pandemic
Then when we got to the third major topic of this pandemic, how to keep it under control, I knew I had been lied to ALL THE TIME by government scientists, their advisors, ministers, and the people on TV ( 7'57''). And this impression has unfortunately been confirmed by the time (8'0''). So the whole matter it's ONLY ABOUT CONTROL (8'3'').
Of course I make my own thoughts about what this control should be used for, which I also like to pass on to the audience (8'11'').
Example of a maneuver: The criminal PCR test by Dr. Drosten with mostly FALSE-positives - total fraud on the customer
Right from the start I publicly criticized the PCR test, the polymerase chain reaction test (8'18''), because I understand the matter quite well and know enough about it (8'21''). I'm not an expert in molecular biology (8'24''), but I've hired people who are (8'27''). And I understand how PCR works (8'29''). The idea is to develop Preima [?], bait so to speak (8'33''), for what you are trying to prove (8'36''), and then to amplify it repeatedly (8'38''), potentially up to a million times (8'41'').
We know that from the DNA tests that are used for forensic purposes (8'45''). And I point out that the PCR test mostly uses the same technology (8'50'').
Imagine you are preparing for a trial (8'54 ") and you and your lawyer [and] the judge are supposed to show the conditions under which PCR tests are carried out (9'0"). Relatively inexperienced laboratory staff perform 100,000e of pitting operations every day in the same laboratory (9'8''), and you say:
"See your honor, my client's sample is one of those that are on the table there (9'14''). You know that there could be a cross combination - I even suspect that is inevitable (9'19''). But you will get the result shortly. " (9'22'')
The judge would throw all the evidence out of the courtroom, and rightly so! (9'27'') - But just this technology is used to find out whether a sample from you or a family member or someone close to you is "positive" for this virus or not (9'38''). It's completely deceptive how it's done (9'41''). You simply cannot carry out such a technique on an industrial scale and expect the results to be meaningful (9'48''). And they are not (9'50''). I don't think they were ever meaningful (9'52'').
Fact: Diagnostic tests can always turn out positive
One of the scams by our government ["US"] and the people they hired to run these tests is that they refused to accept the FALSE positive rate (10'6''). I assure you: Every repeated diagnostic test will sometimes lead to a positive result - even if there is NOTHING in the sample (10'15''). This is called a FALSE positive (10'17''). FALSE-negative results also occur (10'20''). But let's focus on the FALSE-positive results (10'23''). We don't really know whether this happens in half a percent of the cases or in 4 percent of the cases (10'28''). This is extremely important to determine whether there are many infections in your area or almost none at all (10'35''). But you will not find anyone in the world who has measured and published this so-called operative FALSE-positive rate (10'42'').
You should ignore all publications of case numbers in your area because they are completely fraudulent (10'48''). You cannot do a medical diagnostic test without carrying out control action on-the-spot (10'54''). I am emphasizing that again and again.
Defamation against Dr. Yeadon
The MoSSad media censorship and defamations against Dr. Yeadon - the moderate journalists boycott Dr. Yeadon
I experienced censorship, insults, and quite unsightly things - for example on Twitter (11'4''). People were hired to write abusive, bad and hateful things about me (11'9''). These people were not at all ready to test something scientifically (11'13''). And that very quickly led to less self-confident and less angry people stopping to comment (11'19''). And I think that was the point (11'22'').
Government censorship - most scientists are coward and go along with it - Dr. Yeadon remains a truther
Over time, I found that when I spoke to other scientists, often with retired scientists or academics of my generation (11'30'') who now hold a professorship in immunology (11'33''), then they agreed to me privately in all these topics (11'36''),
-- that the PCR tests [of the criminal Dr. Drosten], as they are carried out, are completely nonsensical and fraudulent (11'42'')
-- that the assignment of deaths in the way it is carried out is completely stupid (11'47''), and
-- that the lockdown was clearly irrational and probably killed many people (11'52'').
But they weren't willing to say anything in public (12'0''). Because those in charge at the university don't want them to question the narrative of their government or their advisors (12'7''), so they don't (12'9''). And so it happened that these people just turned their head not looking any more (12'12''). And the more they looked away, the fewer people there were like me (12'16'').
And so I finally became an exotic person who constantly says things that others question again and again (12'21''). And then it was very easy for them to write propaganda stories against me (12'25''), and to call myself an "opponent of vaccinations" - and anyway: I would have "lost my mind", or [I] would be on the "inclined path" (12'31''). If something of it were true, I wouldn't have to be listened to (12'35'').
But I assure you that I am NOTHING of any of these (12'38'').
Thesis: The political lie has become the new STANDARD since 2001: The governments want to have slaves - want to take away ALL freedoms - LYING WITHOUT END
I comment on this because I believe that not only my life but also the lives of my children and grandchildren should be stolen through a systematic process of fear and control (12'53''). And I think that will lead us into a bad time (12'56''). That's why I really want to wake you up (12'59'').
If the government lies to us again and again, we get used to the fact that politicians sometimes tell white lies and we somehow let them have their way (13'7''). But if they lie to you about something technical that you could check, and if they keep doing it for months in many areas of the same event (13'16'') then please believe me that they are not telling the truth (13'19 ' '). And if they are NOT telling the truth, it means that "something else" is going on (13'25'').
And I'm here today to tell you that something very, very bad is happening (13'30''). And if you are not careful, you will soon lose every chance to do something about it (13'35''). And don't say you haven't been warned (13'37''). Because I warn people as long as I can and as much as I can (13'41'').
You can still - right now - bring back your normal society (13'45''). You can recapture it tomorrow (13'47'').
You DON'T NEED any masks that don't work (13'51'').
Forget lockdowns. They NEVER slowed down the transmissions (13'54''), because they usually only took place in facilities such as hospitals and nursing homes (13'59'').
You do not need to be vaccinated with inadequately tested and sometimes even dangerous gene-based spike proteins (14'6'').
You do NOT have to do what you are told by corrupt scientists who apparently advise our government (14'12'').
The decisive step of the Corona19 dictatorship: the "vaccination card"
If you don't do that in the next few weeks, it will be over (14'17''). I think if it comes to a so-called vaccination card, you've missed the chance to reverse it - and you will regret it (14'24'').
The criminal governments since 2001 have castrated medicine - and now the maneuvers since 2020:
Maneuver: Governments CANCELED curing infections by boosting the immune system - and INVENTED criminal mRNA gene vaccination
From the beginning, even before the virus came to our country ["USA"], government policy turned the decades-long understanding of how to protect people from infectious diseases on its head (14'45''). We had NEVER performed a lockdown before (14'48''). And the good reason for this is that it is not effective (14'52'').
Truth: The sick belong in quarantine, not the healthy
I have just explained that you have to have symptoms to be infectious (14'56''). So we quarantine the SICK - we have always done that (15'1''). We have quarantined the sick because we are thus avoiding infection of the population (15'7'').
Truth: The lockdown is absolute nonsense
The idea of quarantining HEALTHY people, this so-called lockdown, is therefore a NEW INVENTION (15'13'') and has no basis, neither in science nor in the history of epidemic control (15'18'').
Truth: Testing healthy people is absolute nonsense
Even the mass testing of people without symptoms is not scientifically supported at all (15'30''). It's just a method to scare people (15'34'').
Truth: People without symptoms are HEALTHY
Also the idea that you can be sick even though you have no symptoms (15'38'') and that you would be a threat to other people even though you have no symptoms (15'42''). THAT is also an invention from 2020 (15'46''). There is simply no evidence of this (15'48''). And it also contradicts common sense (15'51'').
Truth: You can often recognize sick people from the outside
Most people already see when they approach someone whether that person is a health threat (16'6''). You can tell by the posture (16'8'') and the way this person moves (16'11''). You know this person has symptoms: eyes, nose, etc. (16'15''). And if that is the case, you instinctively keep your distance (16'18'').
Truth: Dying of a respiratory virus in winter was not uncommon even before 2020
And if you think about it, it goes back to prehistory, where it could have been fatal in winter (16'25'') to catch a respiratory virus and maybe be out of action for a few days (16'29 '' ). That might have been enough to get killed (16'33''), even if you were otherwise fit and healthy (16'35'').
So it is a great evolutionary advantage for us that we can perceive whether someone is a threat to us or not (16'43''). And the fact that we can do that very well shows you that it is a reliable guide to whether someone is a threat to you (16'51'').
Truth: People WITHOUT symptoms are NOT contagious
So whoever has no symptoms will not infect you (16'55''). He could stab you or hit you on the head (16'58''). But he will NOT pass you on any respiratory tract infection that could kill you (17'2'').
2020: The Corona19 terror against the truth
And yet we have lockdowns (17'7'') - talking about asymptomatic transmission (17'9''), use PCR tests (17'11''), and repeatedly demand the wearing of masks (17'14 ' '). All of these things have either never been used or we already knew they didn't work (17'20'').
You can check these things in 5 minutes if you haven't already (17'25''). First the government lies to you for a few weeks, and then it will be a few months, and then over 1 year (17'31'').
Truth: Corona19 is simply a new flu virus
Hey guys, this is a respiratory virus that is slightly worse than the flu (17'38'') in older and previously ill people. It is definitely less serious than the flu for those who are younger and fit (17'44''). This is clear from the published literature on Covid-19 (17'49'').
So why is the working-age population still hiding from a health threat? (17'56'') - It is less of a threat to you than influenza (18'0''). And you're still being told to run away and hide after 14 or 15 months or so (18'6''). You have to know that this is completely inappropriate (18'9'').
Problem: Scientists have little contact with the population
And something else happened: The point is that I'm a scientist (18'14''). I'm not good at what I do at the moment (18'16''). You know, I have no training in how to talk to people who are not scientists (18'22''). But I would say I'm a professional scientist (18'25''). I was very good. I really enjoyed my career and I did well (18'30'').
Truth: Yeadon is being isolated because of his Truther activity
You know, I am not paid for this educational work (18'34''). I receive absolutely nothing except criticism and social isolation from my colleagues (18'39''). So you can trust that what I say is sincere (18'43''). Because I pay the price for it (18'45''). I lost work (18'47''). People I have known for decades don't want to talk to me anymore (18'50''). So I am very sincere in what I do (18'53'').
Warning: The Illuminati governments are lying
I warn you that the governments around the world - and certainly your government too - lies to you in different ways (19'2''). This is easy for you to determine (19'4''). If you decide not to do that [and to chase after the lying Masonic Illuminati government] then there is nothing I can do about it (19'9''). Then you are exposed to the propaganda and lies from people [and PR bureaus!] who are very well trained in how to do it [how to manipulate the masses with lies] (19'16''), and I'm a complete amateur (19'18 '' ).
So I'm just telling you: if you check what I said, you will find that it is true (19'25''). And if you find one thing that your government has said that is clearly not true, then I ask you the following (19'32''): Why should you believe anything other than what they have told you? (19'36'') - Don't you think there's something with this retired ex-Pfizer guy after all? (19'41'')
The control of statements made by the Masonic Illuminati Governments
I'll show you a few things that you can check (19'48''). And if I'm right - and I am - I ask you to stop assuming that what you are being told is true (19'55''). That's the best I can do for you (19'58'').
I can't convince you. I can't sweep away a year full of highly precise propaganda from people who lie to you (20'6''). I can only point out that they are lying to you (20'9''). And we will go through a number of examples (20'11''). And in the end it's really up to you (20'13'').
If you choose the side of easy lies, there is absolutely nothing I can do to stop you (20'20''). But if you take the side of the uncomfortable truths, wherever I am, then you are welcome, and I am happy to help you (20'27'').
Yeadon's passion: Doing something against illness
One of the reasons I went into the commercial field early on was because I wanted to do applied research (20'37''). I really wanted to be part of teams that find new cures (20'42''). I've always liked applied research (20'44''): How things work, why they sometimes don't work, what we could do about them (20'49''), THAT is the love of my life (20'52 '' ).
Free blue sky research in the 1980s - and the manipulated research for the government in 2020
But I had some colleagues who wanted to do blue sky research [research without defined aim] (20'56 "), and back in the 1980s they probably could do that (21'0"). You could maybe get a job at the university and apply for scholarships (21'5''). And then they could actually do things that they thought were "interesting" (21'9''). And if they made good progress, that often attracted further funding (21'14''). So you pushed the research (21'17''). The pharmaceutical industry still wants to do applied research today (21'22''). Some methods have changed (21'24''). But the goal is pretty much the same as it was when I joined in the 1980s (21'29'').
But my academic friends report that things are completely different at universities (21'35''). Nowadays most of the funding still comes from governments (21'40''). But then they also want to determine the topics that are often agreed at international level [there decide UN, research societies, Red Cross, lodges like P3 of criminal gay Vatican etc.] (21'45 "). And if your research falls under one of these topics, you may be funded - and if not, you will literally be starved (21'53 "), because the only other sources of funding are large, private institutions (21'59").
GB and research grants
In Great Britain, for example, the largest [funding institution] is the Medical Research Council, [these are] basically public funds [which are distributed to researchers there] (22'5''). Another is the Welcome Trust, a very large foundation that serves to advance the research that is of interest to its management (22'13'').
Nowadays, academic researchers pretty much have to adhere to the guidelines (22'18''). So if there are certain subject areas that are covered by private funds or endowments and grants (22'26''), then you have to work in THESE areas (22'28''). And then it becomes very difficult (22'30'').
2020: Governments are blocking any free research
Independent research is not only NOT supported, but it is often not tolerated at all (22'35''). I think it was very easy to get such scientists to do what you tell them to do in the last year (22'42''). And above all, they don't challenge the Covid narrative (22'45''). In the last 3 months I have spoken to 8 professors at British universities whose specialty is immunology (22'53''). I talked to them about virus mutations and they ALL agreed with my interpretation (22'59''). But NONE of them would say anything [about this in a radio or in a tv channel] (23'2''). And that's because they don't get a grant from the Welcome Trust or the Medical Research Council if they talk about it [in public] (23'9'').
So I want you to know that academics are easily pushed around in your country, both by politicians and by people with a lot of money (23'18'').
2020: The Illuminati governments and billionaires determine what is researched
In summary it can be said: The most important change that I have noticed in the last 40 years is that university research is no longer mainly directed by the department heads and the individual researchers (23'41''), but by the government and from those who provide the most funding (23'46''). And I regret that. It obviously has some advantages (23'50''):
2020: Research is just corrupt
It means that a country's resources are focused on certain areas, and who can say they are not the right ones! (23'58'') - But I think the most important thing is that the academics are unfortunately no longer independent (24'3''). So if you expect a university professor to be knowledgeable - yes, he probably is (24'10''). But if you expect them to be honest and independent, then you are naive (24'15''). Because they have to pay attention to where they are (24'17 "), who smears the butter on their bread [who pays them their wages] and who finances them (24'21"). And they are no longer able to be independent (24'24'').
2020: Honest scientists are only: ex-CEOs + a few retired academics
Probably the only ones who are really independent are former biotechnology CEOs, people like me (24'32''). I'm not a member of any club, nobody pays me (24'35''). And maybe a couple of retired academics (24'37''). Most of them will not comment because they still have connections to their old departments (24'43''). You may have an emeritus position (24'46''). So there are really very, very few really independent people (24'51''). And the rest is subject to the influences to be expected when the money comes from a very small number of sources (24'58'').
And that's something completely different than a few years or a few decades ago (25'3'').
How governments and their public relations organizations are spreading medical lies:
Lie 1: Those who have antibodies are said to be "immune" to infections - this is NOT TRUE - T cells were forgotten!
One of the really serious and misleading things that you hear very often is the insinuation, or the claim, that you are immune to infectious diseases if you have antibodies (25'17''). They probably did that because most people think that antibodies confer immunity (25'22''). And of course antibodies are quite important against certain infections, at least bacterial infections (25'29''). If you don't have antibodies, it can be very difficult (25'32''). But that's not the only part of an immunity (25'35'').
Viral infections do NOT depend on antibodies
And it is important that the immunity to viruses does not depend on antibodies at all (25'40''). Viruses are very tiny things, really tiny, and their business is to get into your cells as quickly as possible (25'47''). So they bind to a receptor on the surface and inject themselves into a cell (25'53''). They are inside (25'55''). Antibodies are large molecules and are usually OUTSIDE of your cells (25'59'').
Think about it for a moment: Antibodies and viruses are in SEPARATE areas (26'5''). The virus is INSIDE the cell, the antibodies are OUTSIDE the cell (26'10''). I'm not saying that antibodies don't play a role (26'19''). But they are not very important [in the case of a virus infection] (26'21'').
People WITHOUT antibodies can fight off Corona19: Infected cells are killed by defense cells
And that has been proven by some people, with whom a natural experiment took place (26'27''). They have a defect and do not form natural antibodies, but they are able to fight off Covid-19 - the SARS-Cov-2 virus - fairly well (26'36''). And they do this through what is known as T-cell immunity (26'39''), a cellular immunity (26'41''). There are cells that are so to speak trained (26'44'') to recognize and kill virus-infected cells (26'48''). And so you defend yourself against a virus (26'50'').
All this talk about antibody levels is just nonsense (26'55''). It is NOT a scale of whether you are immune or not (26'59''). Its existence is an indication that you have been infected, but it is not important for whether you are immune (27'6'').
Truth: Playing with "antibodies" = political operation - T cells or cellular immunity are kept secret
I believe the emphasis on antibodies is a psychological operation (27'14''). It should make it clear to you that the antibodies give you immunity and when they disappear, you lose the immunity (27'21''). But that's not true (27'23''). There are SEVERAL arms of the immune system (27'25''), and the T cells, or cellular immunity, is ALMOST NEVER talked about (27'30''). It's not a new thing. We have known that for decades (27'33'').
Immune system: T cells have been known since the 1970s / 80s
So you can't say now: Oh, maybe it has something to do with T cells (27'38''). One now pretends that the T cells have only recently appeared on the scene, and that it is questionable how important they are (27'46''). [That is] absolute nonsense (27'48''). We have known about T cells for decades (27'51''). They were clearly in my undergraduate textbooks (27'56''), and we know their importance in the defense against respiratory viruses, probably since the 1970s (28'0''), and most certainly since the 1980s (28 ' 2''). So don't believe if people suggest to you that their role is "uncertain" (28'7''). This is just nonsense (28'9''). We have known for a long time that it is absolutely central (28'13'').
Lie 2: Virus mutations are dangerous - this is NOT TRUE - even SARS from 2004 is still recognized!
And I'd like to explain to you why the virus mutation story is just another lie. And it's about T cells (28'21'').
[The most criminal liar with the mutations is? Mr. President Johnson from England! He claimed mutations to be dangerous so half of the world was trembling. Johnson GO TO PRISON FOR YOUR PAYED LIES! What an ASSHOLE you ARE President Johnson!]The 5 components of the immune system
Your immune system has several components and you are susceptible to various types of infectious threats (28'35''): parasites, fungi, bacteria, viruses - these are the main categories (28'39''). These penetrate you in very different ways and threaten you (28'44''). Therefore it is not surprising that your immune system has four or five different arms (28'49''):
-- the innate immunity (28'51'')
-- the mucous membrane (28'52'')
-- the antibodies (28'53'')
-- the T cells (28'54'')
-- and the complement (28'55'').
Governments are rushing with the term "antibodies" - and T cells are not mentioned
There are all these different, wonderful systems that work together (29'0'') to defend you against various threats to the environment (29'3''). And I tell you that the emphasis on antibodies in relation to viral respiratory infections is wrong (29'9''). You can easily check that if you search a little (29'13''). Then you will probably recognize why we are constantly being told about antibodies [by the lying governments], even though they [the antibodies] are probably not that important (29'20'').
And why not talk about T cells that are known to maintain tissue defense? (29'27'')
Propaganda with high death rates for spreading fear+organizing criminal lockdowns
When this virus was first discussed, even before it landed in our countries (29'33''), there were exaggerated hints of exaggerated risks (29'37''). At the beginning it was said that maybe 3% of those infected would die, which is really terrible (29'44''). In the case of the flu, for example, one normally assumes 0.1% - one in a thousand (29'51''). But even that doesn't give you any idea of your relative risk (29'55''). The older you get, the lower the chance that you will experience your next birthday (30'0'').
Truth: The real death rates for NORMAL flu from 60 or from 80
Statistically speaking, if you're 60 years old like me, I have a 99% chance of seeing my next birthday (30'9''). But when I'm in my mid-80s, I might only have a 50% chance of seeing my next birthday (30'16''). And inevitably you come to a point where you no longer turn the cards (30'21'').
If you think about the risk of dying from the flu, the older you get, and the sicker you already are, the greater the risk that you will die from it (30'31''). Just something has to be the cause then (30'33'').
Truth: The real death rates at Corona19 before or after 70 - NO lockdown is needed
This virus that causes Covid-19 is very similar (30'54''). It's just a slightly bigger risk for you (30'57''). If you're over 70 and already sick, you're at greater risk than the flu (31'2''), not much more, but it's a little worse (31'5''). But the reverse is also true: If you are younger than 70 and have no previous illnesses, it is a lower risk to your health than the flu (31'14'').
So it is just absurd that you are ready to let the economy and civil society break down because of something that poses a lower risk for almost all professionals than the flu (31'27'').
Keep in mind that in the worst case scenario, this virus poses a slightly higher risk for old and sick people than the flu, and a lower risk for almost everyone else who is younger and fit (31'40''). It was NEVER necessary for us to have done anything (31'44''). We didn't have to do anything: NO lockdowns, NO masks, NO mass tests, not even vaccinations (31'50'').
Corona19 drugs work: asthma drugs, ivermectin
There are several therapeutic drugs that are at least as effective as vaccinations (31'56''). They are already available and inexpensive (31'59'').
-- Inhaled cookticostiroids, which are used for asthma, reduce the symptoms by around 90% (32'7'').
-- A study just published this week shows that an off-patent drug called ivermectin - one of the most widely used drugs in the world - is also able to treat symptoms at any stage of the disease, including lethality - to reduce by about 90% (32'26'').
NO vaccinations are needed - but the cr. Illuminati governments and their "advisors" destroy everything with their "measures"
So you don't need any vaccinations, and you don't need any of the measures that have been introduced (32'33''). So it is not just a matter of a disagreement (32'36''). I would say, objectively, none of these things were ever required (32'41''). And yet the governments and scientific advisors lied to us for a year and produced chaos that potentially means some kind of fatal damage to our economy and our civil society (32'54'').
Lie 2: Virus mutations are dangerous? - IT'S A LIE!
[President Johnson: GO TO PRISON FOR YOUR LIES! And also all who were acting to simulate dead bodies (in India!) or who were filling garbage bags with paper putting them aside of hospitals for simulating dead bodies (Brazil!) !]Most seriously, in my opinion, your governments and advisors have misled you on the topic of virus mutations and the related topic of booster or variation vaccinations (33'9''). That honestly scares me, and that's the trigger for my videos (33'14''). So let me explain briefly: This is really vital for you (33'18''):
The typing errors in the reproduction of RNA viruses = mutants with only 0.3% deviation, which are not recognizable
It is quite normal for RNA viruses like SARS-Cov-II to make typographical errors when they replicate (33'25''). You have a very good error detection and correction system (33'29''). So you don't make too many errors in typing, but you make a few (33'33''). And these are called variants or mutants [mutations] (33'36'').
But you have to know that THESE mutants that differ most from the sequence identified in Wuhan only differs 0.3% from the original sequence (33'47''). Or to put it the other way around:
The mutant that differs the most is 99.7% identical to the original (33'56''). And I can assure you that this difference is absolutely incapable of presenting itself to you as another virus (34'4''). You want to believe that maybe mutants can escape your immune system (34'9''). And THAT is an absolute lie (34'11''). Why do I know that
SARS 17 years ago: Immunity has lasted for 17 years - also against the Covid-19 mutation with a 20% difference (!)
Well: 17, 18 years ago there was a virus called SARS (34'19''), which is actually very similar to SARS-Cov-II (34'23''). It is 80% similar to SARS-Cov-II (34'26''). And there were some experiments that were done last year (34'30''). People who had been infected with SARS 17 years ago were asked to donate blood (34'36''). And then tests were carried out on these cells in the blood to find out whether the circulating immune cells were still able to detect SARS 17 years later (34'46''). And they were it (34'48''). They all still had memory T cells that were circulating in their bodies (34'52''). That's great. I would have expected exactly THAT (34'55'').
And they did another important experiment (35'0''): They show the T cells of the same people the new virus SARS-Cov-II (35'4''). And I'm not surprised that they recognized this new virus (35'8''). This is because the new virus is 80% similar to the old one and 20% different (35'14''). A 20% difference was NOT enough to fool these people's immune systems that it was a new virus (35'21'').
Mutants are NOT a threat - the Illuminati governments of Johnson + Biden etc. with their LIES: THEY ARE THE THREAT!
It simply recognized that this is a brother, or a sister, or a cousin from something that was already defeated (35'28''). So, when the scientists from the government are shouting that a mutation would be a danger for your health when it's only of 0.3% different from SARS but presenting itself as a new virus and threat (35'41''), so you must konw that they are lying (35'43'').
The "booster vaccine" is an invention with NO NEED (!)
If governments are lying - and they are - why is the pharmaceutical industry making booster vaccines? (35'49'') - They produce them! You should be just as horrified as I am at this point because there is absolutely no possible justification for this production (35'58''). But they are produced (36'0''). And the world's drug agencies have said: Because they [the booster vaccinations] are quite similar to the original vaccinations that are now being given [since late 2020], no clinical safety studies is needed to be conducted (36'11'') .
I say again: The mutants are not so different that they pose a threat to you (36'21'').
Resistance "USA", July 8, 2021: Appeal from Dr. Yeadon: Live normally!
"Take back your normal life!" The passionate appeal from ex-Pfizer researcher Dr. Mike Yeadon
(orig. German: „Nehmt Euch das normale Leben zurück!“ Der leidenschaftliche Appell von Ex-Pfizer-Forscher Dr. Mike Yeadon)
<Dr. Mike Yeadon, with degrees in biochemistry, toxicology and respiratory pharmacology, for 17 years with the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, where chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research and vice president, has been warning the public for a year against a monstrous web of lies and deceptions about the corona virus, its alleged danger, the futility of the lockdown measures and the deadly dangers of the vaccines used. Since then, attempts have been made to make him unbelievable with lies and slander. He is an opponent of vaccinations, has unclean motives and earns a lot of money with his false warnings. Now his collar burst in an interview (hl):
Video: Ehem. Pfizer CEO platzt der Kragen (2'20'')
Video: Ehem. Pfizer CEO platzt der Kragen (2'20'')
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBxj0lN0sr4 - YouTube-Kanal: Spartacus - hochgeladen am 5.7.2021
Link on Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/pelfYjW25FxU/ - Bitchute channel: NatMed-etc. - installed July 12, 2021
Code embed: <div align="center"><iframe scrolling="no" style="border: none;" src="https://www.bitchute.com/embed/pelfYjW25FxU//" width="640" frameborder="0" height="360"></iframe></div>
The statement of Mike Yeadon against the lies of the criminal Mossad media:
I spent 32 years in the pharmaceutical industry (2''). It doesn't sound very likely that I would be an anti-vaxxer, does it? (5'') - Really, absolutely, you honestly you would have to be stupid if you think that's my motive, right I've made - I've made plenty of money I could I could retire (15''). I have the whole of my life for the last year trying to warn people (18'') - ah, that we have being done, ah, no, I have said before, I have had no public comment about anything prior to that (24''), and no - I don't monetize anything, I don't know how to do it (27''), and also I don't need to (29''). So no, ah - the only reward I get from telling people like sharing my scientific insights is lots of insults (35''). So if you want to believe that no to me onto that so then screw you (38''), seriously. No! I really don't - I am NOT your audience, am I (44''). If you want to think I am an anti-vaxxer says: screw you (46''). I am angry because people have been really really badly taken advantage it, they have been scared by [pause], and it's just awful (55''). Also the people doing it, new people there, I hope you hope you are going to enjoy the sewer that you have created for yourself, for your family, your friends and your community (1'5''). You should be absolutely ashamed of yourself what you are doing (1'8''). You really should (1'9''). I am certainly ashamed of you (1'12''). I am blazing, I am - I am absolutely blazing any doctors (1'16''), but you guys are at least as clever as I am, I am blazing about any physicians in the NHS (1'22''), who has been so stupid that they believe what they have been told, and have been not treating their patients (1'26''), not allowing to see each other (1'29''), pretending masks protect them, pretending the PCR test works (1'32''), jabbing them with a vaccine when most of them don't need it (1'35''), you are making me ill (1'37''), you hypocritical foolish stupid people, all of you (1'43'').
Stop it, and the people who ar not that, the innocent public, discard your masts (1'48''). Grab the people around them, give them a hug and a kiss (1'50''). You are not going to catch something from it and say you know: what we have had enough we are gonna stand between the criminals and our children from today (1'58''). We are not having any mor of it, that's what we need to do (2'1''). That's what you need to do firmly, no violence (2'5''). Lock arms together and just tell people, everybody else you know, what this is: ALL LIES (2'9''), and it STOPS TODAY (2'11''). You can - you can take it back, you can take back your old normal [life] today, this evening, this beautiful summer's evening in England (2'17''). Take the old normal back today (2'20'').
Teilen / share:
Bevölkerungsuhr: Es gibt KEINE höhere Sterblichkeit 2020